Inhalt des Dokuments
zur Navigation
Contact
- © fotostudio charlottenburg
Visiting address
Room H 3133
(Hauptgebäude, Straße des 17. Juni 135)
(Campusplan) (Wegbeschreibung)
Tel. +49 30 314-27500
Fax +49 30 314-26934
Email jew@wip.tu-berlin.de
Mailing address
Technische Universität Berlin
Fachgebiet Wirtschafts- und
Infrastrukturpolitik (WIP)
Sekretariat H 33
z. Hd. Jens Weibezahn
Straße des 17. Juni 135
10623 Berlin
Teaching
Current Courses
- Operations Research - Grundlagen (OR-GDL)
- Operations Research - Methods for Network Engineering (OR-INF)
- Energy Economics - Energy Sector Modeling (EW-MOD)
- Energy Economics - Student Research Project (EW-PJS)
- Investments (MBA)
Topics for papers and theses
I will advise students in the fields of my research focus. Please contact me for further details.
Publications
| Zitatschlüssel | luth_distributional_2020 |
|---|---|
| Autor | Lüth, Alexandra and Weibezahn, Jens and Zepter, Jan Martin |
| Seiten | 1993 |
| Jahr | 2020 |
| DOI | 10.3390/en13081993 |
| Journal | Energies |
| Jahrgang | 13 |
| Nummer | 8 |
| Zusammenfassung | The European Commission's call for energy communities has motivated academia to focus research on design and trading concepts of local electricity markets. Literature provides a wide range of conceptual ideas and analyses on the technical and economic framework of single market features such as peer-to-peer trading. The feasible, system-wide integration of energy communities into existing market structures requires, however, a set of legal adjustments to national regulation. In this paper we test the implications of recently proposed market designs under the current rules in the context of the German market. The analysis is facilitated by a simplistic equilibrium model representing heterogeneous market participants in an energy community with their respective objectives. We find that, on the one hand, these proposed designs are financially unattractive to prosumers and consumers under the current regulatory framework. On the other hand, they even cause distributional effects within the community when local trade and self-consumption are exempt from taxes. To this end, we introduce a novel market design – textbackslashtextit\Tech4all\ – that counterbalances these effects. With only few legal amendments, it allows for ownership and participation of renewable technologies for all community members independent of their property structure and affluency. Our presented analysis shows that this design has the potential to mitigate both distributional effects and the avoidance of system service charges, while simultaneously increasing end-user participation. |